





 |
|
Results & Impacts
A. Accomplishments To Date
A recently completed evaluation,
conducted by the New Orleans Metropolitan Crime Commission (MCC), has shown
that Project Return has consistently reduced violence and lowered recidivism
rates for men and women released from prison and residing in New
Orleans. The resulting benefits to taxpayers and crime
victims include improved public safety and significantly lower costs.
The MCC evaluation examined the
first four-years of operation and documented:
- That during the
first year of release from
prison the program intervention maintains a 89.3% success rate, with only one
in every ten graduates of the program returning to crime;
- In year one, the recidivism rate for a control
group was (37.2%) over three times that of the program graduates (10.7%);
- During the second year of release 75.6 % of the
program graduates were still in the community and had not returned to crime.
- In year two, the failure rate for the control
group (51%) was double that of the program graduates (24.4%); and,
- Further analysis of the data showed that when
graduates of Project Return recidivate, it is for less violent offenses; while
40% of Project Return participants were convicted of violent offenses, only 6%
of the graduates that recidivate are convicted of violent offenses.
The MCC report concluded that Project Return is an effective ex-offender re-integration program. The
services provided to program participants enable them to make a more successful
transition from prison to the community compared with similar ex-offenders who
do not participate in or complete the program. Project Return also appears
successful in reducing recidivism rates when compared with other programs for
ex-offenders nation-wide. As noted, the recidivism rates in those studies
reviewed ranged from 24 percent to 48 percent one year after release compared
with 10.7% for Project Return.
Cost/Comparative-Cost/Cost-Benefit Analysis
The following cost analyses are
based upon a comparison of the rate of recidivism for 1800 men and women
that have participated in Project Return (25%), with the average recidivism
rate for all ex-offenders released from Louisiana
prisons (75%). In addition, four types of related costs are included in this
analysis: Criminal Justice System (CJS) Costs; Costs to Victims of Crime
(Victim Costs); Project Return Costs (Project Costs); and, the Costs of
Re-Incarceration.
An average cost of $100,000 per individual is estimated to
be the cost of pursuit, arrest, arraignment, detainment, trial and
incarceration.
The U.S. Department of Justice estimates that, on average, a criminal offender will
cost crime victims $100,000 per year
during the period following release from prison and prior to being
re-incarcerated, and that each recidivist will perpetrate these damages for an
average of four years before getting caught.
The per-participant cost for
Project Return - $5,000
The Metropolitan Crime Commission evaluation confirms that the 1800
Project Return participants are similar to the average persons released from Louisiana`s prisons, and therefore, including
a comparison of the following costs is appropriate:
Project Return Recidivism Costs (1,800 Participants)
- Project Return had 25% (450) of its participants return to prison after Project Costs
of:
(450 x $5,000)$2,250,000
- Cost to Criminal Justice System:
(450 x $100,000)$45,000,000
- Cost to Victims: (1 year)
(450 x $100,000)$45,000,000
Thus, 450 or 25% of all Project Return participants,
returned to prison at a cost of:
$92,250,000
State of Louisiana Recidivism Costs (1,800 Released Inmates)
1800 persons released, 68% (1225) returned to prison.
- The CJS Costs for this population was:
(1225 x $100,000)$122,500,000
- The Victim Costs for one-year was:
(1225 x $100,000)$122,500,000
Thus, 1350 or 68% of the prisoners studied, were
returned to prison at a cost of:
$245,000,000
Cost of Re-incarceration
Using conservative estimates of the annual
incarceration costs, per offender, at $20,000 and of the average length of
sentence served upon return to prison at 2 years, the 25% recidivism rate for
Project Return participants resulted in incarceration costs of $18,000,000 (450
recidivists x $20,000 per year x 2 years). The incarceration cost of the 68%
recidivism rate for offenders leaving prison and not participating in Project
Return is $49,000,000 (1225 recidivists x $20,000 per year x 2 years). Thus,
with these 1800 participants, Project Return has saved Louisiana taxpayers $31,000,000
in the costs of incarceration.
Opportunity Costs: Return on Investment
The estimated cost to Louisiana taxpayers for the rate of recidivism associated with Project Return
participants is estimated at $92,250,000. Comparing these costs with the
estimated costs associated with the rate of recidivism for the same number of
men and women released from prison without
Project Return, $245,000,000, indicates, over a five-year period, a savings
of approximately $153,000,000. Adding the $31,000,000 in cost of incarceration
savings and subtracting $5,000,000 in operating costs, shows that Project Return saved taxpayers
$179,000,000 over a five year period, a $36,000,000 per year return on an
annual investment of $1,000,000.
During this
same period, it cost taxpayers $179,000,000 to not have Project Return
available to the 1800 men and women who left prison and were subsequently
included in the Metropolitan Crime Commission evaluation as a comparison group.
B. Prospects For Replication
All components of Project Return, with the
exception of Community Building,
are easily replicable. The educational software can be purchased from its
manufacturer. The drug/addictions testing materials, educational testing
materials, and the psychological testing materials can all be purchased,
applied and scored with a minimum of training and effort.
The Community Building
component, which enhances the success of all other aspects of the program,
requires that at least two facilitators be trained in leading the workshop that
initiates each new class. Prior training in group process and/or group therapy
is usually a plus but not a requirement for this training. The facilitators at
Project Return will offer the training or recommend another source for it.
Plans for replication in other cities are under consideration by officials from
BJA.
|